In a significant shift within the art world, the Tate has announced its decision to dissociate from the Sackler family by erasing their name from its London venues.

This decision comes amidst a backdrop of legal controversies involving the Sackler family, whose involvement in the pharmaceutical industry has been critically linked to the opioid crisis in the United States. Notably, the Tate Britain gallery will see the renaming of its Sackler Octagon wing and another room, distancing itself from the family’s past philanthropic contributions.

The initiative extends to the Tate Modern, situated along the stylish South Bank of London, where the Sackler name will vanish from around the gallery’s escalators.

An additional room in Tate Modern is also slated for rebranding, effectively eliminating any reference to the Sackler family’s previous support.

This move was reached through mutual agreement with the Sackler family representatives, as confirmed by a Tate spokesperson, marking a pivotal moment in the gallery’s history.

The Sackler family, founders of Purdue Pharma and Mundipharma, faces widespread criticism and legal challenges due to the devastating impact of opioids, particularly OxyContin, on countless lives.

Accusations have been made against the companies for underplaying the addictive qualities of this drug. In a notable development in 2020, Purdue Pharma admitted to criminal charges related to the opioid epidemic, culminating in a substantial financial settlement.

This period also saw the Sackler family engaging in philanthropy, perceived by some as an effort to salvage their reputation amidst growing scrutiny.

Recent legal actions have reopened the possibility of future lawsuits against the Sacklers, despite previous settlements that seemed to provide the family with immunity.

This reversal has sparked debates within the art world about the appropriateness of accepting sponsorship from sources mired in controversy.

While the Tate has opted for a clear break from the Sackler legacy, the Victoria and Albert Museum in Kensington has, for now, chosen to maintain its association with the Sackler name, despite its links to the family’s pharmaceutical fortune.

This divergence in responses highlights the complex interplay between ethics, philanthropy, and the arts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top